General
Presenters
Eligibility: All graduate students currently enrolled in UCSB Master’s or doctoral graduate programs are eligible to participate.
Collaboration: In cases of collaborative research, the presenter’s individual contribution to the project must be salient and clearly specified.
Publicity Permissions
By signing up, presenters agree to allow the UCSB Graduate Division to use their photos and videos for publicity surrounding the contest and/or in other contexts, such as promotional materials, website, etc.
2024 GradSlam Final Round Runner Up Nakoa Farrant
Visuals
The UC-wide Grad Slam competition has recently updated its guidelines, limiting presentations to one static slide. This means that animations, transitions, and sound will no longer be permitted. UC Santa Barbara will be aligning with these updated requirements to better prepare our competitors for the final round. Additionally, UC Grad Slam Finalists will now be required to use Powerpoint for their slide.
While this is a change from previous years, the simplified format allows participants to focus on honing their public speaking skills and delivering impactful presentations without the distraction of managing a clicker or worrying about technical issues. Using visuals remains optional, but slides can be a valuable tool to enhance your talk when used thoughtfully.
We hope these changes encourage participants to think critically and creatively about the type of visuals (if any) that best complement their content. Please note: Slides must be original to the presenter and cannot be professionally designed. You may include photos, visuals, charts, or graphics created by others, but these must be properly cited or attributed.
To help you get started, we’ve provided a Google Slides template below that will convert easily Powerpoint. While you are not required to use the designs included, we encourage you to use it as a framework to build a polished and effective slide.The template contains preloaded colors and fonts that follow UCSB's visual identity guidelines.
Timing
Presentations should be no more than 3 minutes total in length.
The talk timer begins when the student starts talking. For the preliminary rounds, a member of the Graduate Division will be seated in the front row with an iPad timer that presenters may use for reference during their talk.
If the presentation is longer than 3 minutes, points will be deducted from the final score as follows (not to exceed a total of 10 points deducted for timing penalties):
3:03-3:05 - 1 point deducted
3:06-3:08 - 2 points deducted
3:09-3:11 - 3 points deducted
3:12-3:14 - 4 points deducted
3:15-3:17 - 5 points deducted
etc.
Judging & Scoring
Judging for both the Preliminary Rounds and the Final Round Showcase will take place live and in person, with the winners of the Final Round Showcase announced during the event.
To ensure a diversity of perspectives, all judging panels will include a balanced mix of faculty, staff, graduate and undergraduate students, and community members. Judges are carefully selected to represent a range of disciplinary and professional backgrounds, and every effort will be made to avoid potential conflicts of interest.
Judges will evaluate presentations based on four key criteria:
- Accessibility: The presenter translated their research and its disciplinary significance into language that all audiences can understand.
- Organization: The presenter delivered a talk that followed a clear and logical sequence.
- Delivery: The presenter used an effective performance style, including appropriate body language, eye contact, expression, volume, and pace.
- Engagement: The presenter conveyed enthusiasm for their research and successfully captured and maintained the audience’s attention.
The four categories are:
Accessibility
The presenter translated their research and its disciplinary significance into language that all of us can understand
Organization
The presenter delivered a talk that followed a clear and logical sequence
Delivery
The presenter delivered the talk with an effective performance style in terms of body language, eye contact, expression, volume, and pace
Engagement
The presenter conveyed enthusiasm for their research and captured and maintained the audience’s attention
Note that presenters will no longer be judged on their visuals and the former criteria have been streamlined into these new categories in order to evaluate the types of skills we aim to train students on.
Additionally, there is space at the bottom of the scorecard for judges to enter their written feedback for presenters as well. This feedback, along with the scores, will be compiled and shared anonymously with students via email within one week after the round.